Supreme Court Hears Case That Could Impact Transgender Procedures on Children Nationwide
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in a case that could have significant implications for gender-altering procedures for minors across the nation.
The case centers around Tennessee – one of 26 states that have moved to block certain types of procedures for transgender-identifying children – and the outcome could shape policies in other states as well.
Outside the Supreme Court, protestors gathered, divided by a line of fences. On one side, supporters of the plaintiffs, including families of transgender children, voiced their opposition to Tennessee's law banning gender-altering efforts like puberty blockers and hormone therapy. On the other, those in favor of the law argued it is necessary to protect minors from long-term, irreversible harm.
The case, U.S. v. Skrmetti, was first brought by three transgender-identifying children and their parents, who argue that Tennessee's ban violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, calling it sex-based discrimination. The plaintiffs contend that the law unjustly restricts access to essential medical interventions for kids.
One teenage plaintiff explained the struggle of living in a body that does not align with their gender identity: "It's not very comfortable being trapped in... you know, because it just doesn't feel like you."
Tennessee lawmakers, however, defend the law, asserting that it is designed to protect children from irreversible medical procedures that they argue could cause harm in the long run.
Tennessee's attorney, Matthew Rice, also pointed out that parental rights are not the central issue before the Court.
This is the first time the Supreme Court has directly considered a state law regarding transgender-identifying people. But U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, speaking on behalf of the Biden administration, contended that the case is about something more. "This is a case about access to medications that have been safely prescribed for decades to treat many conditions including gender dysphoria," she told the justices.
Opponents of gender-altering treatments for minors point to documented cases of regret among some young people who transitioned, raising concerns about the medical risks involved.
The justices seemed divided on the issue with liberal justices pressing Tennessee's attorney on the potential harm caused by laws like the one in question. "One of the articulated purposes of this law is essentially to engender, encourage gender conformity and to discourage anything other than gender conformity. And I'm wondering how you think that plays into the analysis," said Justice Elena Kagan.
In contrast, conservative justices framed the issue differently, emphasizing parental rights. Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked, "Why not trust parents rather than the state to decide, especially since there's no direct harm to third parties?"
Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the law was not an outright ban, but instead, it focused on the age of patients seeking treatment.
"Much of your, the latter part of your opening statement suggests that the... well, it seemed to suggest that there's an outright ban on this treatment, but that's not the case. It's really for minors. So why isn't this simply a case of age classification when it comes to these treatments, as opposed to a ban?" he said.
Chief Justice John Roberts also questioned whether the Court is the appropriate body to address evolving medical issues: "Is the Court really the best institution to make decisions about medical treatments as these issues evolve?"
As the case moves forward, the Supreme Court's decision is expected to have a major impact on the debate over gender-altering procedures for minors, setting a legal precedent that could influence future state laws across the nation. A decision is expected by June.
RELATED: Former Trans Kids Warn Others – 'Don't Do It!'
'Art Club': Family Shares 'Horror Story' After School Staff Tries to Turn Daughter to Be Transgender
'Barbaric Pseudo-Science': Detransitioner, Doctor Report 100% Failure of Trans Surgeries on Kids
Montana Couple Files Civil Rights Lawsuit After State Took Daughter Away Over Gender Transition
'My Son Was Gone': Christian Parents Find Support Amid Sudden Surge in Gender Confusion
Elon Musk 'Tricked' into Putting Son on Puberty Blockers: Xavier Was 'Killed by the Woke Mind Virus'
***Please sign up for CBN Newsletters and download the CBN News app to ensure you receive the latest news alerts and updates from a distinctly Christian perspective.***
About The Author
