Court Rules Texas Heartbeat Law Can Remain in Place While Litigation Continues
Read Transcript
- The fate of a Texas lawbanning most abortions
in the Lone Star State
may soon be in the handsof the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court already allowed
the Texas abortionrestrictions to take effect,
now the Biden administrationis pushing the High Court
to rule on the law's Constitutionality.
So far, the Texas lawhas outmaneuvered courts
by putting enforcements inthe hands of private citizens
who are encouraged to sue anyone
who assists in ending a pregnancy
further than six weeks along
or after a heartbeat isdetected in the womb.
The push from the Justice Department
comes after the failure ofat least three DOJ attempts
to block the law infederal appeals courts.
- Well, here now, Chuck Donovan,
president of the CharlotteLozier Institute.
Chuck, thanks for joining us tonight.
The Supreme Court already weighed in,
allowing the Texas law to go in effect.
Chuck what is it about this law
that has made it so that judges
and court panels keep it going
and is this attempt, this latest attempt,
by the Biden administration
to get the High Court to halt the law
any different than the one before?
- Well, I think it's becausethe stakes in this case
are fairly high, to say the least.
It activates when theunborn child has a heartbeat
that has been detected by the abortionist.
That could be as early as six weeks,
something that many Americans don't know,
certainly many women don't know,
and the stakes are very high.
And it also does somethingunprecedented, as you mentioned,
it authorizes privatecitizens to bring action,
and apparently even citizensoutside the state of Texas,
to sue the abortion providerfor $10,000 in maximum damages
if they perform an abortion.
The problem with the case
is so you have to havea case or a controversy,
you have to have actual litigants.
And what the Justice Department
and the plaintiffs below are asking
is for the Court to kind of imagine
what sort of case might happen
and then make a rulingenjoining everyone in Texas
from acting on this law.
I don't think that's going to work.
I think you'll see repeated attempts,
but I think the focus shouldremain on the Dobbs case.
- Chuck, could the High Court rule
on the Constitutionalityof the Texas abortion law
and if so, what could thatmean for the pro-life movement?
- Well, I think there'scertainly a chance they can.
You know, everyone wants to have money.
We're a gambling society now,
so people are putting their bets
on which case will reach the Court.
My personal one, eventhough I'm not a gambler,
is that it will be Mississippi,and it's 15 weeks long.
The reason is clear.
The Supreme Court hascertified the potent issue
whether or not states may banabortion prior to viability,
which has moved three orfour weeks since 1973.
The science is overwhelming
about what's happeningto babies at that stage.
They pump 26 quarts of blood a day,
they interact with their environment.
If they're twins, theyinteract with each other.
That's the case I think the Court's
gonna wanna deal with first
and it will, in all likelihood,resolve Texas as well.
- Chuck, since the lawtook effect in September,
Texas women, and evena girl as young as 12
have sought abortionsin neighboring states,
some driving hours throughthe middle of the night.
Does forcing women totake such drastic measures
actually lead to fewer abortions
or to the argumentpro-abortion advocates make,
does it potentially endanger women
who are already desperate enough
to make such a devastatingdecision to end a pregnancy?
- I think we have to lookat exactly everything
that Texas has done.
It's one of a hundred laws
that have been passed around the country.
They cover a wide range of topics.
Texas added $100 million toits pregnancy support budget.
Texas is likely soon tobe surrounded by states
that will protect the unborn.
(indistinct) possibly the exception.
And the truth is that you haveto go along with these laws,
you have to have support for women.
Texas is doing that.
There are 200 pregnancy centers in Texas
that have spent $33million in the last year
in pregnancy support,according to our new report.
If we have an attitude of support...
And by the way, the abortion industry
wants to handle all this byshipping pills to minor girls.
That's exactly the kind ofthing a parent might want to sue
an abortionist for doingin the state of Texas.
- All right, Chuck Donovan
with the Charlotte Lozier Institute.
It's great to have youwith us this Friday.
Thank you, sir.
- My.