'Natural Immunity Is 27 Times More Protective': GMU Prof. Todd Zywicki Explains His Vaccine Mandate Exemption
Read Transcript
- Well, joining us now is Todd Zywicki,
George Mason UniversityFoundation, professor of law.
Todd, welcome back to Faith Nation.
We want to start off witha new poll from Axios
that shows strong majority of Americans,
including suburban voters,
support vaccine mandatesfor federal workers
and private companies.
Todd, your thoughts.
Are mandates the wayto overcome hesitancy?
- Mandates are certainly notthe way to overcome hesitancy.
Which is that compellingsomebody to do something
is not going to make themmore willing to do it.
And I think what we're seeing already
is a revolution coming about,
especially among those likeme who have natural immunity.
There's some reports now
that nurses who have naturalimmunity are quitting.
They're closing...
There was a report that said
that they're trying to reschedule births.
I've heard about cardiacunits being shut down.
People of natural immunityneed to be respected here
because of the risks thatthey're putting on us.
And this sort of draconian,just crushing people,
is not gonna overcome vaccine hesitancy.
You might force somepeople to give vaccines,
but that's not going to improvethis country's commitment
to coming together to fight this pandemic.
- Todd, you just mentionedthat you earned an exemption
because of your naturalimmunity from George Mason.
Your thoughts, does that exemption,
do you think it should applyto the broad vaccine mandates
that were announced by the White House?
- Of course it is.
This is a completely misdirected way
of addressing this problem.
We are a year and a halffrom this pandemic by now.
What we should be focusing onis people's level of immunity,
however acquired.
Whether it's by vaccineor by natural immunity.
And that's the way out of this.
It's not by vaccinating people
who don't need to be vaccinated, like me,
forcing people who havehealth risks to get vaccinated
just so that they cango to work or whatever,
leaving in the handsof individual employers
to determine whether or not
somebody has a legitimatemedical exemption.
It's just crazy.
It's crazy and itviolates the constitution.
Your right to bodily autonomyand your bodily integrity
is not a matter of majority vote,
and it's not a matter thatwe put up to suburban voters
to determine whether somebody has a right
to be free from ainvoluntary medical activity.
And I just think it's a terribleway to go about doing this.
We should be focusing on immunity
and that's our glide path
to get out of this in the long run.
Immunity, however acquired.
- Todd, I think a lotof people might wonder,
you know, you fought and wonyour case against George Mason.
People who might want to seek an exemption
or fight vaccine mandatesrequired by work,
might want to know,
have you experiencedany type of retaliation
or any type of backlash?
- I have not, not in the slightest.
And I have to say itpartly has to do with,
I have a remarkable group of colleagues,
I have remarkable groupof students where I teach.
I gave a talk on this last week
for our Student FederalistSociety Chapter,
and the room was packed,and the students loved it.
Which is, the science onthis is clear at this point.
And unless you're just some sort of,
have some superstitiousattachment to the vaccines,
the science is clear,
natural immunity is robust,it's durable, it's broad,
it protects against variants.
And we all know the Israel study now
that finds that natural immunityis 27 times more protective
than vaccines againstsymptomatic infection,
and eight times more protectiveagainst hospitalization.
It's really no contest at this point.
And the idea that we're gonnacontinue down this one path
of vaccination andignore natural immunity,
my students and my colleagues are at least
are too smart for that.
And I wish that somebodydowntown in the White House
would wake up to that fact as well.
- Todd, we only have a fewseconds left, literally.
Any suggestions on how health officials
can help overcome hesitancy or skepticism?
- Yeah.
They should stop forcingpeople to do these things,
and they should recognizenatural immunity.
It's anti-scientific and it's harmful,
and it's causing a lot ofharm to a lot of people
by forcing them to get vaccinated.
- We'll have to end it there.
And thank you for ending on time.
Todd Zywicki with George Mason University.
Thank you so much for being with us today.