(soft tense music)
- [Jenna] Tonight, spotlight on big tech.
- Aggressive enforcementof our anti-monopoly laws
and our merger laws is critical.
- [John] Congresspushing a number of bills
aimed at the internet'scorporate gatekeepers.
- Here's the question.
Do we think House Democrats want to stop
big tech censorship of Republicans?
- [Jenna] Plus, the plight ofChristians in the Arab world.
- There was a lot ofhope and I was hopeful.
- [John] 10 years after the Arab Spring
rocked the Middle East.
- [Jenna] And a Democrat remembers
the longest serving Republicansenator from Virginia.
- John Warner is a reminder
of what we can do when wecome together as one nation.
- All this and moretonight on "Faith Nation."
(uptempo music)
Angry parents give a schoolboard a failing grade
over its proposed curriculum
that's now stirring controversy.
Welcome to "Faith Nation."
I'm John Jessup.
- Good evening. I'm Jenna Browder.
Tonight, the firestormover public education
is spilling into the mainstream
after a raucous schoolboard meeting in Virginia
in the suburbs of Washington DC.
- It ended in two arrests last night
after the board abruptlyhalted public comment
on gender policy, a heated topic
that's making Loudoun County Schools
the latest hotspot in the culture wars.
(participants clapping and shouting)
More than 300 people attended the meeting,
many to oppose a plan thatwould require teachers
to use a child'spreferred gender pronouns.
The district's policieshave been a lightning rod
for months now, landingLoudoun County Schools
in the national spotlight.
- [Mother] Hi, I'm back here today proud,
as a proud, screaming parentof a young transgender son
in our Loudoun County schools.
Today, instead of focusing on the hate
that seems to be dripping
off the followers of Jesus in this room
and from their kids in our schools,
I wanted to take the time-(participants jeering)
I can wait.
I can wait.
The reality is LCPS isnot parent-led education.
It's government forced indoctrination.
- [John] Several meetings have been marked
by explosive exchangesover the curriculum,
which critics say employs what's called
critical race theory.
At one meeting earlier this year,
parents shocked the school board
by reading aloud sexuallyexplicit passages
from the required highschool reading list.
An effort is underway
to recall several school board members.
Last night's meeting was the last
of the academic calendar year.
- Meanwhile, at the Supreme Court today,
in a near unanimous decision,the justices ruled in favor
of a student punished by herschool for using expletives
in a Snapchat.
The eight to one high courtpointing to the First Amendment
and freedom of speech.
They say schools cannotenforce their rules
outside of school grounds;
therefore, the Pennsylvaniaschool district
violated the First Amendmentwhen it punished a cheerleader
for using vulgar languageon the digital app.
- To the humanitariancrisis at the border.
After resisting calls tovisit the southern border
amid a surge of migrants,the vice president is set
to make the trip there this week.
Vice President Kamala Harris,
tasked by President Bidento deal with the crisis,
will go to El Paso, Texas on Friday.
It follows the White House announcement
allowing more migrants toenter the United States
to make asylum claims.
Homeland Security isnow considering migrants
whose cases were terminatedunder a Trump era program
that sent asylum seekers backto Mexico for pending cases.
- Tonight, tensionsbetween Russia and the West
are spilling over intolive fire on the high seas.
Warning shots fired
from a Russian warship Wednesdayagainst a British destroyer
amount to the firstlive ammo confrontation
between Russia and a NATOwarship since the Cold War.
According to the Russian military,
a Russian war plane also dropped bombs
all to deter a Royal Navy ship's passage
in the Black Sea near Crimea.
The British Ministry of Defensedenied being fired upon,
adding that the HMS Defender
was sailing through Ukrainian waters
in accordance with international law.
And back here in Washington,lawmakers on Capitol Hill
are pouring over a package of bills
aimed at taking away power from big tech.
- That's right, Jenna.
They're debating six bills,all in committee now,
before they get theirday in the full House.
As CBN White House CorrespondentEric Philips reports,
so far, it's proving tobe a controversial process
every step of the way.
- The bills are in theHouse Judiciary Committee,
going through what's known as markup.
That's the process where thebills are debated, amended,
and rewritten, a processthat is challenging
because, while everyonerecognizes there is a problem,
some feel the legislation goes too far
while others say it's not enough.
The six bills take aim atsome of the biggest names
in corporate America: Facebook,Apple, Amazon, and Google.
They range in scope fromincreasing fees companies must pay
when filing for a mergerto barring a business
from merging with a competitor.
- Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google
are gatekeepers to the online economy.
They bury or buy rivals andabuse their monopoly power,
conduct that is harmfulto consumers, competition,
innovation, and our democracy.
- Big tech censors conservatives.
These bills don't fix that problem.
They make it worse.
They don't break up big tech.
They don't stop censorship.
- Who elected you and put you in charge
of what the media are allowed to report
and what the Americanpeople are allowed to hear.
- [Eric] These issues are not new.
They've sparked fire at CapitolHill hearings for months.
- Let me be clear.
We approach our work withoutpolitical bias, full stop.
To do otherwise would be contrary
to both our businessinterests and our mission.
- [Eric] Some complainedthis latest effort
going through committeecreates a partnership
that is powerful, but in the wrong way.
- Overall, the powerthis gives to the FTC,
big tech working togetherwith big government,
doesn't address the issue ofbreaking these companies up.
- [Eric] Lawmakers are itching to act,
even as big tech companies
have been the subject of lawsuits.
For example, 48 statesfiled an antitrust lawsuit
against Facebook, andthe FTC did the same,
saying the social mediagiant needs to be broken up.
- Facebook argues that consumers
are free to choose an alternative
if they're not happy with Facebook.
I think that's not really accurate.
So of course you can goto another social network,
but the power that economistscall network effect,
the fact that all of ourfriends are on Facebook,
makes it very difficultto choose an alternative.
- Tech giants are pushingback hard against these bills.
They're arguing thatthe proposed legislation
would require them to breakup or stop offering services
that customers have come to demand.
The companies alsocautioned that the proposals
could harm the US economy justas the country is rebounding
from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Eric Philips, CBN News.
- Joining us now is Chris Lewis,
president and CEO of Public Knowledge.
Chris, always great to see you.
These bills, as Eric justpointed out in his package,
are aimed at thegatekeepers of the internet.
Chris, how legitimate is the concern
that the government, inconjunction with these companies,
could have too muchpower over the censorship
of certain content and voices online,
and particularly when it comes to those
who say they've beenslighted, like conservatives?
- Right, well I understandthe concern of the government
determining what is said online.
I think it's evident from the fact
that the big tech companiesare opposing this package.
That is not the case.
You know, here, the government is looking
to reign in the power ofbig tech by making sure
that there's competitionin the marketplace
and that the antitrustagencies have the tools
at their disposal toprotect that competition
so, when users don't like the practices
of a digital platform,
they have competitors that they can go to
and they have choices in the marketplace.
- Can anything be done, Chris,
to better regulate censorship?
Is it really a good idea
to put the government in chargeof watching the watchers?
- Well, someone's gotta be incharge of watching big tech,
and certainly the government,with an expert agency,
with agencies with authority,power, and resources,
can and should, I believe,
take a strong role in doing that.
Now, dealing with censorshipis a challenging thing
because you don't want government,
or at least we don't wantgovernment at Public Knowledge,
determining what is saidand what is not said online,
or certainly not from alevel of one piece of content
to another piece of content.
So we need rules andoversight at agencies,
and preferably, we wouldcall for a digital regulator,
but we certainly need thetools in this package of bills
to give the antitrust agencies power
to at least preservecompetition in the marketplace,
which gives consumers power
to choose which platforms they use.
- Chris, you keep talkingabout competition.
I wonder though, how much does this effort
dive into the sheer powerbehind corporate giants
like Facebook, Apple and Google?
Are any of these bills
aimed at breaking up big tech monopolies?
- Yes, so in this package,
there's a a bill that proposes
creating a higher standardfor those big tech platforms
to merge with smaller competitors,
so that preserves competitorsin the marketplace.
There's a promotion of interoperability
and non-discrimination rules
so that they can'tself-preference their own content,
self-preference their own toolsthat ride on the platform.
And there's a bill thatactually gives more tools
to the antitrust authoritiesto break up a company
if they can make the case to the courts
that that is necessary.
So these are all in this package of bills.
- Chris, if you were advising lawmakers
there on Capitol Hill, bothon the right and on the left,
how would you suggest that they tackle,
if you will, the perfectpiece of legislation
that might bridge the bipartisan divide?
- Well, I think the bad newsis that I don't think there is
a perfect piece of legislation.
I think that's why you see a package
of five or six bills here,
and there may be moreto come in the future.
The good news is that this package
does have bipartisan supportled by Chairman Cicilline,
Ranking Member Buck, andother members of both parties.
So there's bipartisanopposition, bipartisan support,
and that usually meansthat at least we're headed
in the right direction here
in looking at some consensus solutions.
- All right, Chris Lewis,
president and CEO of Public Knowledge,
we appreciate you joining us this evening.
It's great to get your insights
and we'll continue to watch this
and hope you'll comeback and join us again.
- Thank you.
- [Jenna] And coming up,
a new focus on the oncebipartisan Hyde Amendment,
blocking federal funding for abortions.
(dramatic music)
(driving music)
(protestors shouting)
(foot stomping)
- But having sex beforeyou're married is a bad idea.
- [Man] Don't tell me there'sno such thing as gun violence.
- That just depends on yourdefinition of when life begins.
- [Announcer] Watch Dan andDale tackle trending topics
that your faith on the next "Faithwire,"
Monday night at 8:30 onthe CBN News Channel.
- [Announcer] "The Global Lane"takes you around the world,
providing facts over fiction.
- What might rising tradeand geopolitical tensions
mean for you on the home front?
- [Announcer] With over45 years of experience,
award-winning journalist Gary Lane
brings you the truth from a global angle.
- What about the issue of immigration?
- [Announcer] World news analysis
you won't see anywhere else.
- And it's all right hereon "The Global Lane."
- [Announcer] Thursday night at 8:30
on the CBN News Channel.
(upbeat music)
♪ And where there's joy, there's action ♪
♪ It's like a great attraction ♪
♪ That starts a chain reaction ♪
♪ Moving on, more satisfaction ♪
♪ I know the way is joy ♪
♪ Makes me move ♪
♪ I got the joy ♪
♪ I dance around because I know it ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ I move around because I got it ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ Joy's in the heart ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ I dance around because I know it ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ I move around because I got it ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ Joy's in the heart ♪
♪ Joy ♪
♪ Joy's in the heart ♪
♪ Joy ♪
- Welcome back.
A pro-life advocacy group
is targeting eight Democratic lawmakers
over their stance on abortion
with a six-figure digital ad campaign.
- [Announcer] Now they want to overturn
decades of bipartisan consensus,
but taxpayers shouldn'tfoot the bill for abortions.
That's right, Kelly-
- [John] The ads, run bythe Susan B. Anthony List,
are aimed at vulnerableDemocrats running for election.
They coincide with a new push
for the return of the Hyde Amendment,
restricting taxpayer dollarsfrom funding abortions.
In a letter to Congress from22 state attorneys general,
Alabama Attorney GeneralSteve Marshall writes,
"The decisions to rejectthe Hyde Amendment
is an affront to state sovereignty."
- And Attorney GeneralMarshall joins us now.
Thank you for being with us, sir.
It's great to have you tonight.
So it wasn't long ago that this issue
really had broad supportfrom both sides of the aisle.
Why is the Hyde Amendment nowoff the table for Democrats?
- Well, I think what we clearly are seeing
is that the Democrats are playing politics
with the lives of unborn children.
Now this was an issue that,when the Hyde Amendment
was first adopted in 1976,had true bipartisan support.
President Biden was clearly,
during his time in the Senate,very supportive of the idea
that if you opposed abortion,you had an absolute right
not to have your taxpayer fundsto fund abortions on demand.
And now we've seen a clear flip-flop
where Democrats are playingpolitics with now the lives
of 2.5 million childrenthat have been saved
since the Hyde Amendment's been adopted.
- You know, in many ways,
the Hyde Amendment was never really seen
as the perfect solution fortaxpayers who oppose abortions.
Many complained it wasjust a ledger line fix.
Still, can you talk about howrejecting the Hyde Amendment
for many Christians and socialconservatives is a violation
of freedom of conscience?
- Well, it absolutely is.
For example, when we have an opposition
to the way that our taxmoney is spent in our states,
we can go to another statewhere we have the opportunity
to be able to exercise our clear thoughts
about how government should operate
and how our tax dollars should be spent
by leaving that location,
which is doing it the wrong way.
Here, when the federalgovernment is dictating
what the policy shouldbe, there's no American
that can avoid the applicationof their tax dollars
being spent on abortions if, in fact,
the Hyde Amendment is removed.
I mean, this is something
not only that's fiscally responsible,
but more importantly, we'veseen the clear saving of lives
of children, now almost 60,000 a year,
if you look at wherethe data currently is,
compared to before the Hyde Amendment.
We lost the lives ofalmost 300,000 children
between 1973 and 1980.
- How did you put together
this coalition of statesattorneys general?
- Well, I think our colleagues
and the 21 that signed the letters with us
are very much supportive ofwhat we can do to protect life,
and understanding that this was an issue
that not only made sensefor our federal budget,
but also was making a differencein our own communities.
The 22 attorneys generalwho have come together
are making a very principled statement
about what the policy thefederal government should be
and also challenging Democratsto be able to explain
why suddenly this needs to change.
Because the reality isthis is all about politics.
This is about this administrationbowing to the far left
and changing what was a validexercise of federal authority
and allowing those likeme who don't believe
their tax dollars shouldbe spent to fund abortions
to be able to know thatthat's not where that's going.
- Are you hopeful that the Hyde Amendment
will be returned to the federal budget
under this current administration?
What would need to happento make that a reality?
- Well, I think we're very hopeful.
I think there's clear opportunityfor bipartisan support
to be able to put it back in.
We believe very strongly thatthe Republican leadership
in both the House and theSenate can stand strong
to make sure this is included as a rider
to the current amendment process.
But what we also know is that Nancy Pelosi
and Chuck Schumer are goingto do everything they can
to keep this amendment removed.
And it's the value of the filibuster,
it's the value of the Republicans
being able to stay together
that ultimately is going to allow
what we believe should take place
and what's been going on since 1980,
and that's to ensure that all Americans
can have clear understandingthat they're funding,
their taxes are not beingspent to pay for abortions.
- I'd love to get you to weigh in on this.
You know, the debate over abortion
is often framed for people on the left
as women's reproductive rights and choice.
But for those on the right,
it's about the 62 million lives
that have been taken sinceRoe v. Wade was enacted
and called legalized abortion.
I wonder, you know, many say that our laws
are a reflection of our society.
And given that you uphold thelaws in the state of Alabama,
I wonder if I can get you to weigh in on
what abortion and legalized abortion means
as a statement for our society.
- Oh, I think it's a testamentto who we are as a people,
that if we can't stand for life,
then where can we truly be advocates for?
And if you look at
where the Americanpopulace is on the subject,
while there may be more,
those that believe in pro-choicethan pro-life, generally,
when we ask specifically thequestion of whether or not
they believe that theirtax dollars should be spent
for paying for abortions,58% of Americans,
that's Republicans,Democrats, and independents,
believe that that's an improper process,
to allow for federal fundingto go for that purpose.
The majority of Republicans,the majority of independents,
and even many Democratssupport this effort,
and so for this amendmentto be able to stay in place,
we believe that there's a reflection
of where society is right now.
And although I clearly opposeabortion as a practice,
and believe that Roe versusWade was wrongfully decided,
this is one that both Republicans,Democrats can get behind
to ensure that those thatPresident Biden even said
in 1994 in a letter,- Yeah.
- if you oppose abortion,
you should be assured that the government
will not compel your tax fundsto be paid for that purpose.
- Okay.- And we're simply
asking for that- All right.
to be implemented here.
- All right, Alabama AttorneyGeneral Steve Marshall,
thank you so much.
It's great to have you.
- Thank you.
- Well, the Federal Reserve chairman
is pointing to an improving economy
as evidence the trillions of dollars
spent by the Fed is working.
This as the nation begins to recover
from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Jerome Powell testifiedbefore Congress Tuesday
that the monetary spigot would stay open
with the rising inflation,which he called transitory.
- Widespread vaccinations
have joined unprecedentedmonetary and fiscal policy actions
in providing strongsupport for the recovery.
We at the Fed will do everything we can
to support the economyfor as long as it takes
to complete the recovery.
- [John] And we'll be backright after the break.
(light music)
- [Announcer] Want tobe a part of a community
that inspires your spiritualgrowth while winning prizes?
The all new myCBN app.
Connect with the communityfor prayer and encouragement,
track and set spiritual goals,enjoy conversation starters
with friends and family, andcollect points to win prizes.
The all new myCBN app,a great place to belong.
Download the app at cbn.com/mobile.
Grow, connect, have fun.
The all new myCBN app.
- [Announcer] "On the Homefront."
- Thanks for joining us forCBN's "On the Homefront,"
where we highlight what the men and women
of America's military doto defend our country.
CBN honors the men andwomen in our military
with an initiative calledHelping the Home Front.
It partners with churchesacross the country
to meet the needs oftheir military families
from repairing homes towiping out medical bills
for wounded veterans.
- [Announcer] Wednesday at3:00 on the CBN News Channel.
(patriotic music)
(inspirational music)
- [Announcer] Too often, wecarry baggage from our past.
You know what it's like.
It affects everything andeveryone in our lives.
It's always there weighing us down
and keeping us fromachieving true happiness.
But do you know God never meant
for us to be trapped in the past?
You can be free of your baggage.
Learn how God's forgivenessleads to changed lives
and new beginnings.
Call the 700 Club.
- It's been 10 years since the Arab Spring
rocked the Middle East and North Africa.
So has anything really changed?
- Another question:Has life for Christians
and other minoritycommunities at all improved?
Senior Washington Correspondent
Jennifer Wishon takes a look.
- There's no question,
the Arab Spring usheredin some bright spots.
But it also created a deadly vacuum
for Christians and other minorities.
From Tunisia to Egypt to Syria,
Americans watched with hopeful eyes
as fed up citizens protestedoppressive governments.
- What we saw was peopletired of corruption,
people of limited rights,limited opportunity,
economic deprivation, sothey took to the streets.
But you know, freedom wasa major component of that.
- [Jennifer] The protestsparked new debates
over religious freedom.
A number of countriesrewrote their constitutions,
but most of their brutal laws remained.
- In Egypt, we've seen Shias, Koranists,
Christians prosecutedunder blasphemy laws.
- [Jennifer] And today,while Egypt is allowing
the construction of churches,
Saudi Arabia is revising its textbooks,
and Sudan has repealed its apostasy law,
the Arab Spring ushered in aterrifying era for Christians.
- In 2014, ISIS fighters massacred a group
of 21 Coptic Christians,ex-patriate workers,
on a beach in Libya,broadcasting the horrific footage
for all to see.
- [Jennifer] ISIS launcheda genocidal campaign
against Yazidis, Christians,and Shia Muslims in Iraq
as the government turned a blind eye,
violence against CopticChristians in Egypt intensified,
and across the region, blasphemylaws actually expanded,
criminalizing the worship of minorities.
At a recent hearing, the US Commission
on International Religious Freedom
discussed how America canencourage meaningful change.
Panelists suggested imposingsanctions on persecutors,
tying strings to the billionsof tax dollars the region gets
in US assistance, andhaving US officials meet
with opposition leadersalong with heads of state
to highlight the importance of diversity.
Bashir says, privately,countries often acknowledge
the benefits of religious freedom,
but maintain the statusquo to appease extremists.
- You know, at some pointyou have to move it forward
and isolate those fringe elements
who are making those threats,
and move forward, comeinto this 21st century.
- Religious freedom advocates agree
the Trump administrationraised the profile
of international religious freedom.
Now they're anxious tosee President Biden's take
on this important tenetof American diplomacy.
Jennifer Wishon, CBN News.
- [Jenna] Still ahead, rememberingthe life of John Warner,
the senator who brought together
both sides of the aisle, next.
(dramatic music)
- Are you suffering from feeling tired
or worn out during the day?
Can you not turn off your brain at night?
You are not alone.
Hi, I'm Dr. MichaelBreus, the Sleep Doctor,
and I've partnered with theChristian Broadcasting Network
and we're gonna bring yousome unbelievable information
that you can use tonight toget a better night's rest.
- [Announcer] Wake up to your best life.
Call 1-800-700-7000 or go to CBN.com
to get your free copy of"Protect Your Sleep" today.
- [Announcer] Nutrition,
exercise,
essential oils,
weight loss,
and more.
It's "Healthy Living" with Lorie Johnson.
- Talk about what's in this.
- [Announcer] Join CBNHealth Reporter Lorie Johnson
to get the latest information
from today's top health experts.
- This is fantastic.
- [Announcer] Find outwhat you need to know
to live a healthier life.
Watch "Healthy Living"Tuesday night at 8:30
on the CBN News Channel.
(dramatic music)
- Woo-hoo!
Hi Superbook fans.
Here's something else you'll love.
Whoa-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho!
It's the new Superbook Bible App.
(grunts)
It's packed with games, activities,
and Superbook episodes thatyou can watch for free.
Oh no!
There's trivia, a fun daily devotional,
and answers to your Bible questions.
Plus, an easy to understand Bible
the whole family will enjoy.
You can even create yourown Superbook character.
Ta-da!
Whoa-ho-ho!
- A Millsbrook Falls man com-- Sorry, sorry, pardon me,
sorry, excuse me, ouch.
- [Reporter] Are you getting this?
- Earn SuperPoints to win daily prizes too
and so much more.
(sighs)
Time to get back to my adventures.
See you soon.
It's the new Superbook Bible App.
Free downloads on iTunes,Google Play, and Amazon.
- Finally tonight,
remembering one of Washington'slongest serving lawmakers.
Late Republican Senator John Warner
earned 30 years of support from voters
across the political spectrum
before passing away at the age of 94.
- And today, PresidentBiden remembered Warner,
his friend and former colleague,
who was also Virginia'ssecond longest serving
Republican Senator.
- John Warner is a reminder
of what we can do when wecome together as one nation.
- The president also described him
as a man of deep commitmentto God and country.
The funeral took place at theWashington National Cathedral
where Warner was also baptized.
Jenna, if I remember correctly,he was also a war hero,
and at one point, marriedto actress Elizabeth Taylor.
- Wow, I didn't know that.
Part of the Greatest Generation
and a life certainly well lived.
- Absolutely.
- All right, have agreat evening, everybody.
- See you tomorrow.
(uptempo music)