Can’t Be Kept Off the High Court for Being Either Pro-Life or Pro-Choice, Personal Views Are Just Personal
Read Transcript
- Senator Feinstein came after her,
I count at least five times,
with basically the same thing about,
"Will you say what you'regonna do about abortion?"
Do you think that JudgeBarrett handled that well?
- Yes.
Look, she said, "My personalviews are my personal views."
They shouldn't be disqualifying
so long as she is following the law
and considering the arguments of counsel
and individual cases orcontroversies that come before her
as a judge either on the Seventh Circuit
or as a future justiceon the Supreme Court.
I mean, just because youhappen to be pro-life
or pro-choice in your personal beliefs,
should not be disqualifyingin terms of being a judge
any more than if youhappen to like Obamacare
or don't like Obamacareshould have any bearing
on whether or not you candetermine whether the law itself
is constitutional.
- There's this list.
This is a letter that's comeout from 50 law professors
and they seem to be from allover the spectrum saying that
she's really well qualified for this job.
Did you see that letterand what'd you think of it?
- Well I haven't seen thatletter but what I did see in 2017
when she was nominatedto the Seventh Circuit
is that every law clerk whoclerked on the court with her
when she was clerking for Justice Scalia,
all of the justices acrossthe political spectrum,
said that even among our August group,
Amy Coney at the timestood out as somebody
who was particularly brilliant
and clearly one of her biggest supporters
has been Noah Feldman, whois a very, very liberal
law professor at Harvardwho clerked at the same time
that she did who said,"Look, I may disagree
"with every ruling thatshe ever comes out with,
"but she is certainly smart enough
"and has the integrity to serve
"as a justice on the Supreme Court."
- Does what you've seen sofar, make you think in any way
that the Democrats aregonna lay a hand on her,
stop her, wipe this nomination out?
- No, I don't think so.
I mean, I think it's prettyclear that there will be
no Democrats who will vote to confirm her.
Senator Collins has made it quite clear
that she is a no vote.
She made that clear evenbefore there was a nominee.
Lisa Murkowski hasn't made a commitment
one way or the other, but evenif she decides to vote no,
I certainly hope that she doesn't,
that still leads 51 Republican senators
and I think that all 51 of them
are going to come to the conclusion that
she is eminently qualified
and will be an outstandingassociate justice
on the Supreme Court.
- All right.
Well, thank you so much for your input.
We appreciate your time.
We've been speaking with John Malcolm
of the Heritage Foundation.