The Christian Broadcasting Network

Browse Videos

Share Email

Faith Nation: January 7, 2019

Faith Nation: January 7, 2019 Read Transcript


- Tonight on Faith Nation,

the stalemate over the shutdown.

The latest on where negotiations stand

on reopening the government.

And withdrawing troops from Syria,

how long will American service members

stay on the ground there?

And campaign 2020, we break down the field

of potential presidential candidates.

That and more, tonight on Faith Nation.

(lively music)

well we are heading into the 18th day

of a government shutdown,

and still no end in sight.

Welcome to Faith Nation, I'm John Jessup.

Well even as the debateover the border wall funding

hampers the shutdown negotiations

between the President andCongressional Democrats

the White House is planning to send

the commander in chief to thesouthern border this week.

Press Secretary SarahSanders announcing today

that President Trump will meet with those

on the front lines ofthe national and security

humanitarian crisis.

National security rather andhumanitarian crisis there.

The President will alsomake a prime time address

on the subject Tuesday.

Meanwhile, talks are still underway

to determine how to put anend to this partial shutdown.

For more on that,

we turn to Abigail Robertsonon Capitol Hill, Abigail.

- While lawmakers goback to work tomorrow,

but meanwhile hundreds ofthousands of federal employees

are on day 17 now of unpaid leave

or going to work withoutseeing a paycheck.

It's the longest governmentshutdown since 2013.

- There's not gonna beany bend right here.

- [Abigail] Still unwillingto budge on his five and half

billion dollar funding request,

the President on Friday floateda different kind of wall.

As a loophole to end the budgetstalemate over the border.

- I think we'll have to build a steel wall

as opposed to a concrete wall.

Whether it's a wall or someform of very powerful steel.

Now the steel is actually moreexpensive than the concrete.

We're probably talking about steel

because I really feel the other side

feels better about it.

- [Abigail] The WhiteHouse acting Chief Of Staff

boils it down to one issue, semantics.

- We're asking for $5.6 billion,they're offering us zero.

It sounds like we're simplyarguing about one variable,

just how much are we going to spend

on that barrier on the southern border.

On the wall, on the steel slat fence,

whatever you wanna call it.

- [Abigail] The President'sall or nothing stance

has the new Speaker OfThe House up in arms.

- The impression youget from the President

that he would like to notonly close government,

build a wall, but also abolish Congress.

- [Abigail] But faced withan unbending negotiator,

top Democrats are leaving the door open.

- We've done fencing in the past.

- [Abigail] Suggestingthat border security

could include a border barrier

depending on other specifics.

- We've done fencing in the past.

However, what is happening today

and hopefully theadministration will come.

The administration has not come up with

any specific plan as to howthey're gonna spend this money.

- [Abigail] Without a compromise in sight,

the President isconsidering other options.

- I may declare a national emergency

dependent on what's gonnahappen over the next few days.

- [Abigail] And he can do it.

- There is a provision in law

that says the Presidentcan declare an emergency.

It's been done a number of times.

- [Abigail] Although theNational Emergencies Act

has been on the book formore than four decades.

But CBN News Chief PoliticalAnalyst David Brody

says the President would stillneed Congressional buy in.

- He could technically go down that route.

He would have to actuallyexplain the statue

that he's using the emergency for.

Here's a bit of the rub.

A Congress, if theydidn't want him to invoke

this national emergencywould be able to overturn it

basically say, no Mr.President you can't do it.

If you can pass a joint resolution in both

the House and the Senate,

that means the language has to be the same

in the Democrat Houseand the Republican Senate

and good luck with that.

- [Abigail] If luck isn'ton the President's side,

he still has options.

- There is one more andthat is using $10 billion

of unused funds that are set aside

for the Army Corps of Engineers.

The President wouldhave to actually declare

a national emergency to beable to dip into those funds.

- Well Democrats have said

if the President declaresa national emergency

to get funding for the border wall.

They will challenge that in court.

And that still does notreopen the government.

- Abigail, can you give usa little perspective now.

I know we're getting into territory

where a large number of government workers

aren't going to be getting paid.

I think at this point,

it'll be about a month without a paycheck.

- Yes and we're hearing stories

of federal employeesfiling for unemployment

or trying to pick up other jobs.

But they say that's really tricky

because they don't know

when they will be going back to work.

But they're worried aboutmaking their mortgage payments

or paying their rent.

We're hearing that federal employees

are putting a lot ofstuff on credit cards.

But they're concerned about that

because if their paychecks don't come,

when those credit card bills are due

then they're stuck withthose interest fees.

And things are getting really bad.

And there's those low income workers,

the janitor staff orthe food service workers

who are technically contract employees.

So they don't evenqualify for the back pay

once the government reopens.

So now they've been 17 days without a job

during the Christmas holiday season.

So that's really tough.

I spoke with someone at NASA who said

thankfully her husband has a job as well,

but she knows multiplecoworkers who are married

and they both are forcedto stay home right now.

They have children.

It's a really hard time of the year

to be missing these paychecks.

So these federal employeesare definitely feeling this

and really struggling.

I think very concernedabout the uncertainty

of when the government might reopen.

- Hard times definitely.

Thank you Abigail for that report.

Well joining us now,

someone who will ultimately weigh in

on the debate with a vote.

That is Indiana Senator Mike Braun.

Senator Braun thank you forbeing here on Faith Nation.

- Good to be here.

- First question for you,

what's the latest that you're hearing

in the Senate about thenegotiations to end the shut down?

- I think it's pretty clear

that the leader saiduntil Schumer and Pelosi

work out something with the President

that he's probably notgonna push anything.

And he was pretty clearon that from the get go.

It's interesting after beingsworn in last Thursday,

you're thrown into this dynamic.

I must say it was one ofthe frustrating things

watching government fromIndiana as an entrepreneur

and legislator and nowI'm in the middle of it.

- Well Democrats passed aspending bill last week.

And one of the thingsthat they claimed was

it was a measure thatRepublicans supported

before the shutdown.

But the measure also included

repealing protections for abortions.

And that's something that isa nonstarter I know for you

and any other conservatives.

- It would be of course.

I ran on a completely pro-life platform.

And was endorsed by Susan B Anthony,

Indiana Right To Life,National Right To Life,

and it's a cause dear to me.

And I think you're seeingnow that they are in power,

that's one of their first things

that they're out there promoting.

Of course it's not gonnaget through the Senate.

President Trump obviously

wouldn't be for anything like that.

When you're showcasing that,

I think that tells youwhere your priorities are.

And it's sad that that was part of it.

- The President and the White House

are now openly talking about declaring

a national emergency tobuild the border wall.

Is that a measure or is thata move that you would support?

- You know I think thatin Indiana at least

border security and immigrationand all the problems

associated with it,

would've been up therethroughout the campaign.

Primary in general, got reallyfocused upon in the general.

Because my opponent leanedthe other direction.

Set in some things,

but then changed his mindfor political reasons.

But I think we're now at the time

where there's been a lot of discussion.

As recently as two yearsago Schumer, Pelosi,

and most Democrats werefor building a wall.

And I think the figurewas more like 25 billion.

Now I think they calculated politically

and I'm not sure they wanna doanything for border security.

So I think the Presidentwill do what he needs to do

to make good on a campaign promise,

and that's to secure the borderwhere needed with a wall.

And he wants mostly though,

to see the Democrats come up with anything

that shows they're seriousabout border security

when it appears they're not.

- Drilling down though,

if did declare a national emergency,

is that something that you would support?

- If he declared a national emergency,

and thought it needed tobe done in that fashion,

most of us would be for it

because it looks like the other side

is doing everything it can to do nothing.

- What do you say to the800,000 federal employees.

And some of those not tomention the contractors

who aren't eligible to get back pay.

What do you say to them?

As Abigail just reported,

many of them will go abouta month without a paycheck.

- I mean one of thingsthat was frustrating

being back home watchinggovernment function this way

would've been for that very reason.

Families do depend on theirjobs and the federal government.

And even if you're for reducing the size

of the federal government like I am

to make it more efficient,

live within its meanslike we did in Indiana,

you still, people are involved.

And I'm hoping that thisis gonna be the showdown

that then sets the stage for a more

rational budget process.

I'm on the budget committee.

And you're gonna see thatI'm gonna roll out a bill

that's been there for a while.

But I think it's gonnahave more currency now

more than ever.

No budget, no pay.

And that means if we can't collectively

as Senators and Congressmanand women get a budget done,

I don't think we deserveto get a paycheck either.

Get a little bit of that medicine.

Federal employees are getting it now.

It's no way to run anything.

You wouldn't get by withthat on a school board,

a state legislature, a business.

It's laughable.

- Senator Braun, we onlyhave about a minute left.

You've been in the Senatefor less than a week,

just sworn in on Thursday.

I know that you ran on acampaign to drain the swamp.

But getting here, being greetedby a government shutdown.

Does that show you justhow difficult it will be

to drain the swamp?

- I think it shows howdysfunctional the system has become.

I'm hoping that there aregonna be more people like me

that come from the worldof getting things done,

living within your means.

We'll double basically the business caucus

with Senator Romney, Scott,and myself coming in.

Maybe someday we'll geteight, 10 to 12 of us

an it'll change the dynamic.

People are gonna needto stick their neck out,

get out of the comfort zone and run.

If we keep sending the samekind of career politicians here

that have never donethings like making budgets

and meeting payrolls, I'dexpect more of the same.

I hope that dynamic changes.

- Indiana Senator Mike Braun.

Thank you so much.

We wish you the best.

Welcome to Washington.

- Thank you.- Thank you.

- Well after his shocking announcement

to withdraw troops from Syria,

is the President changingcourse on the withdrawal?

Trump's National SecurityAdvisor John Bolton

announced new conditionson the President's call

for an immediate pullout.

CBN's White HouseCorrespondent Ben Kennedy

joins us from the northlawn for more, Ben.

- Well John, President Trumpsaid we will still pull out

of Syria but on a different time table

which is more coordinated with US allies.

As you were talking about,

National Security AdvisorJohn Bolton released new

conditions beforeAmerican troops pull out.

One, that ISIS is defeated in Syria.

Second, the countries Kurdish allies

who have been fighting alongsidethe US troops are protected

and three the Iranian forces leave Syria.

If not, American bootswill remain on the ground.

- And to make sure thatthe defense of Israel

and our other friends in theregion is absolutely assured.

And to take care of thosewho have fought with us

against ISIS and other terrorist groups.

- Now Trump tweeted todaythat we will be leaving

at a proper pace,

while at the same timecontinuing to fight ISIS

and doing all else thatis prudent and necessary.

Now this contradicts thePresident's original announcement

saying that American troops

would be coming home immediately.

I just spoke with Dave Adesnik with

Foundation For Defense Of Democracies

on the challenge facing the US

to withdraw troops from Syria.

- Part of it is theoverall strategic challenge

that they have been playinga very important role

in completing the defeatof the Islamic State

which is still active.

Which according to Pentagon estimates

still has tens of thousands of fighters

that are affiliated with it.

They're still inflictinga lot of casualties

on our Kurdish partners in Syria.

So we would be moving out while there

was still ongoing fighting.

And the question is whatwould we be leaving behind

to help take care of thecontinuing Islamic State threat.

- Bottom line is American troops

could remain in Syriafor months even years.

Today Secretary Of State Mike Pompeo

is headed to the regionto reassure Arab allies

amid confusion over theadministration's policy

in the Middle East, John.

- Ben, we know Israel is amajor ally to the United States

in the Middle East.

So how is Israel reactingto the new conditions?

- Yeah, John that's a good question.

Prime Minister BenjaminNetanyahu is no doubt relieved

that the 2,000 US troopsare not leaving Syria,

well at least not right away.

The announcement created concern in Israel

and fear among the US allies the Kurds.

But again Bolton reassured Netanyahu

that America will takecare of its friends.

That is the latest fromthe north lawn here

at the White House.

Ben Kennedy, CBN News.

- Gary Lane, Senior International Reporter

and host of the CBN News channel show

The Global Lane joins us now for more.

Gary, do you see the pull out of US troops

from Syria as a potentialway to empower ISIS in Syria?

- I really don't thinkit will empower ISIS

because ISIS only controlsa small swath of land

in the eastern central part of Syria

towards the Iraqi borderand the Euphrates River.

Who it may empower, is Iran.

And Iran's Security Chief recently said

the US has been defeated in Syria.

That's what this troop withdrawal shows.

So Iran may be empowered.

That would be the bigger concern.

But also everyone isjockeying for position

in Syria at this time.

Because the war is winding down.

ISIS has pretty much been defeated,

so other militant groupsand you see the Kurds

and Turkey jockeying forposition and territory.

Also the Assad regime and Russia and Iran.

That's what's happening right now.

That's why this is of grave concern.

- And what about Turkey?

What role does Turkey play in all of this?

- Well the Kurds willtell you that the Turks

were involved in supporting ISIS.

They allowed ISIS to go back and forth

over their border from Syria into Turkey

and back into Syria witharms, weapons, other things.

So the Turks have a longhistory of supporting

Sunni militants in Syria.

They wanted to see Assad defeated.

They also wanted to see Iran defeated.

And I think that is why we'reseeing the United States

now move towards Turkey tosee them as a counterpoint

to counter of course theIranian influence in Syria.

- And how does this affectChristians in Syria?

- Well the Kurdishmilitias have been the ones

who have been protecting the Christians.

The Christians are veryconcerned about this

troop pull out as are the Kurds.

And John Bolton made a statement today,

basically saying look,

that's the NationalSecurity Advisor by the way.

He said look the Kurdsknow who their friends are.

Well the Kurds are wondering

are you a reliable ally United States

if you withdraw thesetroops and the training

that we've received, that buffer,

that help that we've received over time

in the last couple of years.

Where are we going to be?

And where are the Christians going to be?

So it calls that into question.

Bolton will be meetingwith the Turks tomorrow

as will the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs

and they'll be discussing Syria.

They wanna make surethe Kurds are protected.

The Turks if they makeany military incursion

into northern Syria,

that the Kurds are not going to be harmed.

- Well thank you Gary.

And for more from Gary,

you can catch his show, The Global Lane,

every Thursday night at 9:30 PM

on the CBN News Channel.

The expanding pack ofpresidential hopefuls.

We breakdown the potentialcontenders when we come back.

Welcome back.

Well for the first timein more than 25 years

on the Supreme Court,

Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

missed the court's first day of arguments.

Ginsburg who is recoveringfrom cancer surgery

from last December,

wasn't able to attend hearings today.

But Chief Justice John Roberts says

she will still participateby reading transcripts

from the court's case load.

Today marked the firstday of oral arguments

in the 2019 session.

Well Democrats are already talking 2020.

One major player announced she formed

an exploratory committeefor a White House run

the day before New Year's

with MassachusettsSenator Elizabeth Warren

signaling an almost certain bid,

it looks to be a crowded field.

CBN Chief Political Analyst David Brody

joins us now to sift through what's likely

to be a deluge ofcandidates entering the fray

trying to fight against President Trump.

David, lets start with Senator Warren.

Is she jumping the gun here?

Any momentum by her announcing

her exploratory committee this soon?

- You know John I don't thinkshe's jumping the gun at all.

There are gonna be a lot of candidates

and a lot of progressives.

So why not be the firstone out of the gate.

And that's exactly what she's doing here.

She's got a tough road ahead though.

Look, she is relatively establishment.

A lot of folks are gonna bereminded of Hillary Clinton.

And she isn't the most,

how do we say this andthese are her critics,

the most cuddly person in the world.

In other words she's got a bit an issue

when it comes to turning on the charm.

She's taken some hitson that Instagram video

she put up the other day.

Where it looked a bit stiff.

So she'll have her challenges.

- Now Warren's getting in early,

but this is just the beginning.

I would imagine this is precursor

to what we can expect.

- Yeah, as a matter of fact

we're gonna have so manydifferent candidates running.

I mean it's gonna be probablybe close to 20 or so.

Maybe even more than that.

I can't even imagine that.

So take at a look at whatwe're talking about here.

Now first of all in the northeast,

you've got Uncle Bernie asthey called him in 2016.

He'll be back in 2020.

I don't think there's any question.

And of course, Elizabeth Warren.

That's the northeast, and by the way,

as we stick on the northeast for a moment

remember John Kerry, Massachusetts.

He was the Democratnominee back in the day.

Michael Dukakis, another Democrat nominee

from Massachusetts andthere is Elizabeth Warren.

So that's kind of like

the establishment area of the country.

Let's go on after the northeast,

we're gonna head tobasically the rust belt.

And in the rust belt, we've got Joe Biden.

We've heard about him.

I believe he was Vice PresidentJohn, if I'm not mistaken.

I'll have to Google it.

- You're right.- He was.

- And Sherrod Brown.

Both once again, Biden fromDelaware taking the Amtrak train

blue collar guy,

will get in the gutter withTrump if he decides to run

and Sherrod Brown, once againkind of a gravely voice,

blue collar, progressive.

Who is kind of remakinghimself in the image

of one of those sensibleblue collar Democrats.

- I just wanna clarify there.

You weren't showing running mates,

you were just showing peoplefrom different regions.

- That's right.

- Well let's talk about as you mentioned,

former Vice President Joe Biden.

There were a lot of callsfor Uncle Joe to jump in

into the race back in2016 and save the day.

What's different now?

And what about his age being a factor?

- Yeah, I mean obviouslyage will play into it.

He's 76 years old

and the question is do Democrats,

do progressives especiallywanna go for the

white guy in his late 70s?

I mean Donald Trump is thewhite guy in his early 70s.

And they're thinking that'snot working out too well.

But beyond that, JoeBiden more establishment

in the Democrat field if you will,

they'll call him moderate.

I think a lot ofconservatives would question

how moderate Joe Biden is.

But the point is,

the question is is there room for appetite

for someone that's kindof had his time around.

Where is the energyhere with the Democrats?

And I think you'relooking at electability.

Obviously Joe Biden's got that.

And then there are a lotof other factors as well.

And so I think when itcomes to electability,

Joe Biden cold be on paper at least,

the person that could beat Donald Trump.

- David, you just mentionedenergy among Democrats.

Someone who had a lot ofenergy among Democrats

back in 2016 was Bernie Sanders.

He had so much momentum that go around

but ended up conceding to Hillary Clinton.

Do you think there's roomfor him this go around?

What may be different for him this time?

- A lots different this time around.

Number one, and maybe first and foremost

and this game, set, match for Bernie.

A lot more progressivesin the race this time.

Kamala Harris in California,

we've talked about Elizabeth Warren.

I mean you can just go down the line,

there are gonna be Kirsten Gillibrand.

I mean I can just go on and on.

Before Bernie was taking upall that progressive space now,

and he was a trendsetter in 2016.

But now they're all kind ofpiling on the Bernie train

and now everybody's Bernieto a certain degree.

And that makes it muchmore difficult for him.

- CBN Chief Political Analyst David Brody.

Thank you so much for your insights.

- Thanks John.

- Coming up, why one college football star

says his faith is moreimportant than the sport.

Well tonight the number one ranked

University of Alabama willtake on the Clemson Tigers

for college football'snational championship.

It's the second year in a row

Clemson has competed for the title.

This year the team's led by 19 year old

quarterback Trevor Lawrence.

Even though he's one ofthe most celebrated stars

in college football,

right now Lawrence says it'snot the game that defines him.

- Football is important to me obviously,

but it's not my life.

It's not like thebiggest thing in my life.

I would say, my faith is.

So that just comes fromkind of knowing who I am

outside of that.

So putting my identity in what Christ says

who he thinks I am,

and who I know that he says I am.

So really like I said,

at the end of the day

it doesn't really matterwhat people think about me

or how good they think I play or

- Though he now leads the team,

at the beginning of the season

Lawrence wasn't even a starter.

What a remarkable season for him.

And for more news on faith and culture

tune into Faithwire.

It airs every Monday night at 9:30 eastern

on the CBN News Channel.

For more information howto watch the program,

go to cbnnewschannel.com.

Well that's gonna do itfor tonight's Faith Nation.

We'll see you back here tomorrow.

EMBED THIS VIDEO

Related Podcasts


CBN.com | Do You Know Jesus? | Privacy Notice | Prayer Requests | Support CBN | Contact Us | Feedback
© 2012 Christian Broadcasting Network