David Brody on What Trump Legal Team Is Saying About Legal Jeopardy to the President
Read Transcript
- David Brody is our CBNNews political analyst
and David, this is a mess.
He didn't help with the President any.
Is there any thought thathe might try to pardon
Paul Manafort?
- Well, there's talk aboutthat here in Washington, Pat,
but at this point, a lot of folks,
at least in this parlor game that we know
of Washington, D.C., they'resaying pretty much no,
that wouldn't probably make much sense,
at least at this point.
But you know, thingschange in Trump world,
as we've known.
Look, this is a bit of a mess for sure
for the President but, interms of the legal jeopardy
question here and that's whateverybody is wondering about,
ya know, was is a crime?
Really, there's some mixed views on that.
I would say this, thatfrom a legal perspective,
what we're understandingis that what is the intent?
In other words, would President Trump,
and here's the legalquestion a lot of folks
are wondering and this is the question
that would need to be answered,
would President Trumphave done this anyhow
if there wasn't a campaign?
Well, there's been a history of paying off
a few people along the way and so,
therefore, if it's personal, if it was to
protect the marriage, Melania,
things that were going on there,
that's different thancampaign financial forum
and actually having atargeted reason to do so.
So, that's gonna be theother potential shoe
that could drop.
We'll have to wait and see.
Feels like a drip, drip,drip scenario here, Pat.
- Ya know, it all started with a so-called
investigation of Russian pedaling in our,
meddling in our election.
Mueller has got, that's his mandate.
He doesn't have a mandate to investigate
personal financial wrongdoingor violation of IRS statutes.
So, what are you hearingup there about his
overreach, that's what it amounts to?
- Well that's right, that word overreach,
that you just said therePat, is the keyword.
That has been repeated at the White House,
folks that are close to President Trump,
talking to sources thatare close to the President
this morning saying the same thing,
that this is not onlyoverreach, but talk about
Michael Cohen specificallyand how Michael Cohen
has a credibility problem, they say.
Ya know, we've heardRudy Giuliani say this,
but let's remember,Michael Cohen had said,
at one point early on, thatDonald Trump knew nothing
about any sort of payment and now,
apparently he knew all about the payment
and was directing it to go to, ya know,
from a campaign financereform perspective,
go into the campaign.
So look, they're gonnapoint to his credibility
and that's gonna be obviouslya linchpin of all of this.
As for Russian collusion Pat,
nothing on Manafort,nothing on Michael Cohen.
The one concern, clearly,at the White House,
is what else does MichaelCohen potentially know?
I know they talk about acredibility problem with Cohen
but we hear now thatMichael Cohen might have
some information aboutthis DNC hacking situation
that took place anddid Trump know about it
before it actually happened?
Lanny Davis, Michael Cohen'sattorney suggesting that
that could be the case.
We'll have to wait and see.
- How bout this impeachment stuff?
You know, it would almost be impossible
to impeach a president,but the House may try it
if it switches.
What do you hear about that?
- There's no doubt about it.
Nancy Pelosi and the democratswon't talk about impeachment
before the mid termelections, but they'll talk
a lot about it after forsure if they win control
of the House of Representatives.
I don't wanna say that's the plan,
but that's kind of theblueprint, if you will,
to go after this president.
Look, they were gonna go after him anyhow,
but now, with Michael Cohen's plea deal,
that's the linchpin, that'sthe center of all of this.
If you've got Michael Cohensaying that the president
directly told MichaelCohen to make this payment,
in essence, breakingcampaign finance laws,
you can imagine what thedemocrats are gonna do with that
and remember Pat, if thedemocrats take control
and you know this, but ifthe democrats take control,
what happens?
They have subpoena power.
They're the ones incontrol, not Republicans,
and that's not good newsfor President Trump.
- Well, last thing.
Of course, the Republicanstried to impeach
President Clinton, Bill Clinton,
and they got an impeachmentmotion through the House,
but it failed in the Senate.
So I think, what are people saying?
I mean, it really didn't go anywhere
and Clinton stayed in office.
- Well they don't have 67 votes,
anywhere near it in theSenate is what they'll need.
They would need two-thirds in the Senate,
as you know Pat and it's just not there.
So once again, just back to 101,
you can impeach a President in the House
like what happened to BillClinton but you have to
convict him in the Senateand you'd have to have
two thirds, 67 votes,they don't have that.
Now, having said that,the worst case scenario
is what happened to obviouslyRichard Nixon at the time,
where he basically lostthe Republican party
and they ditched him and at that point,
he was in all sorts ofproblems and he had to resign.
Now, the question then becomes,
how many Republicans willditch President Trump
if this thing gets worse?
And that, we just don't know right now.
- David, thank you somuch for that insight.